Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

A Good Day

On a good day you love everyone on earth

Sunshine glitters on the red paint awning 

Along the street you walked on everyday to the subway station

Crowds move in a slow pace inside the corner cafe 

Is how slow life lingers and wouldn’t let you go or pass you up

On a good day, such a good day you just love everyone on earth 

The fall winds blow gentle and crisp, for a moment 

It feels like spring 

Brown and red leaves are painted green again, in big strokes, ambiguous 

Like stanzas in a poem, original

And refuse interpretation

Like I was mad at you yesterday but can’t remember why I got mad in the first place 

On a good day you really do feel the love for everyone on this earth

Read Full Post »

Mr. Money: Let’s talk first principle. The first principle of modern financial system is, a central bank regulates currency supply with the lever of interest rate…

Me: Wait, what? I thought the government just prints paper money out of nothing.

Mr. Money: Well, not quite… For example, in the United States, there’s the US notes and Federal Reserve notes. US notes are issued by the US government interest-free, whereas Federal Reserve notes are backed by US treasury bond, which is a debt…

Me: Hold on… So you’re saying US dollars are not created equal?

Mr. Money: Correct. For every US note issued by the US government, it puts 1 dollar into the money supply, where as for every Federal Reserve note, it puts 1 dollar into the money supply with the string attached that the US government needs to pay an interest on that dollar, at some point in the future…

Me: Ok, that’s interesting [no pun intended 😈]… but if the US government can issue US notes interest-free, why would it ever want to pay an interest in the future by issuing a debt?

Mr. Money: That’s a great question! In fact, I’m not quite sure either. It has something to do with what the economists are saying in the universities and on TV, that a central-banking-regulated economy is better than one “unbalanced” by an “independent central bank”… Matter of fact, the US government issued US notes from 1862 to 1971, and for some reason after 1971 it was Federal Reserve notes only…

Me: That was… helpful, I guess. But wait, if every dollar created after 1971 has an interest attached to it that needs to be paid back at some point, where does the money for the interest come from?

Mr. Money: Hold your horse, young lady, the interest is not due today. They are all due at some point in the future; some are not due for 30 years! Better still, even if you can’t make the payment when the debt payment is due, you can still refinance and borrow more…

Me: From the future of that future?

Mr. Money: There you go.

Me: Well, it sounds to me like a pyramid scheme.

Mr. Money: It might seem like a pyramid scheme, indeed, but a pyramid scheme is not a problem so long as our future will be more than the present. More people, more consumption, more goods and services, more growth, more GDP…

Me: Hmm, interesting [no pun intended 😈]… but what if the future doesn’t turn out that way? What if everybody all of a sudden decides to become a stoic minimalist and not buy the next iPhone?

Mr. Money: Trust me, that won’t happen. People will always want more.

Me: What if there will be fewer people? Japan has been having population decline for a while.

Mr. Money: Well, I guess they won’t get rid of those debts any time soon 😈

Me: You mean… never?

Mr. Money: You said it. I didn’t. 😈

Read Full Post »

So today I found an interesting video of a teaching by Sadhguru, which he imparted during a conversation with a YouTuber, Tom Bilyeu. It’s a teaching that interestingly contends, as I try to paraphrase, realizing that we don’t know anything is the beginning of being fully alert and present, which – as spiritual traditions like Hindu yoga and Buddhist meditation teach – is the way to become enlightened. It might seem paradoxical at first blush, as it seems logical that we spend our lives accumulating knowledge and experiences and, by the time we are “senior” this and that, comfortably ensconced in our fields of expertise and established in our careers and life, we can finally call ourselves “knowledgeable,” “experts,” and, henceforth, a “success.” But Sadhguru argues that, that, paradoxically, is not how we live, but how we die.

I am transcribing part of the conversation below:

* * *

Sadhguru: To live here without belonging to anything but is still involved with everything takes a lot.

Most people belong but they are not involved. …Belonging is like an insurance policy. It’s simply that. Involvement takes you to be constantly involved with people around you, it takes you to be conscious and on. But I belong to you, I don’t have to do anything as I already professed I belong to you, I’m married to you, I belong to you, legally it’s settled, so I don’t have to be conscious of you, nor do I have to be involved with you, still I belong to you.

So belonging, believing, or identifying, simply means, you have found a way to sleep through your life. It’s called sleep.

When we say, people usually use this term with animals. If they say, “We’ve put our cat to sleep”, what do they mean?

Tom: For real? It means they’ve killed their cat.

Sadhguru: So I’m talking about sleep in that context.

I believe this, I belong to this, I’m identified with this means, it’s sleep, that means you are partially dead, you’ve made conclusions, which takes away the life that bubbles within you. That’s why people are walking around like they are dying in installments.

Tom: Yeah, so the notion of not knowing, and the notion of responsibility are two things that are really powerful…

Sadhguru: Can I just correct something? Not knowing is not a notion, it’s a fact, okay?

You really don’t know a damn thing about this existence, isn’t it? We don’t even know a blade of grass in its entirety. We don’t know a single atom in its entirety. We don’t know a single cell in this body in its complete context. We don’t. We know some things. We can manipulate a few things. But we don’t know much about it.

Let’s say we turn off all the lights. If the lights are on, you can weasel and just walk around wherever you want in this building. Now we turn off all the lights and make it pitch dark where you can’t even see your own hands. Now, every step you take, will you take it in upmost alertness? Will you be fully awake or asleep?

Tom: Fully awake.

Sadhguru: Fully awake. Why? because you don’t know where your next step is. Just live like this. If you simply live like this, naturally you are on the highway to enlightenment.

Everybody assumes and believe because it’s comfortable to believe in something. The very word belief means that I have concretized assumptions of which I know nothing about. Isn’t it?

Either you know or you don’t know. Where does the belief come from? When you pretend you know what you do not know as “I know,” that’s belief. But you cannot believe something all by yourself, so you need a hundred people around you. That’s why always believers are in groups, seekers are alone.

Tom: Talk to me about a seeker. What is a seeker? Is it something useful to cultivate?

Sadhguru: You don’t have to cultivate this. This is intrinsic to human intelligence if you do not bullshit yourself with all kinds of things you do not know as you know.

It’s intrinsic to human intelligence to seek, isn’t it? You don’t have to teach seeking. You have to teach belief systems. If you don’t teach anything, everybody is a seeker. It’s the nature of human intelligence. It naturally seeks. But people want to seek with the comfort of belief. They want to be in their belief system and then seek. It’s like tying their boat to the pier and then rowing hard.

Read Full Post »

所谓知己

知己一词,在中文的语境里,意味十分微妙。说的轻,所谓知己,是一个了解自己的脾性,知道自己的心思的人。说重了,却只有相见恨晚、一往情深、至死不渝的两个人,方才称得上知己。

活了一点年纪了,事情见的多了一些,对很多曾经执着、向往的东西,也都看的淡了。可是,每每念及“知己”二字,总不免悠然神往,似乎这两个再平常不过的字眼本身在嘴里咀嚼的多了,也能琢磨出一番滋味来。

知己知己,首先要“知”。这眼见过的固然是知,可眼睛没见过的也需得知,方才算得知己。高山流水遇知音,魏晋雅士们通过音乐这种抽象又模糊的语言,体察对方的心思、心境、品位、情趣等等。所以,知,不光是知晓,还是感知,和心有灵犀一点通的默契。

因此,所谓知己,可贵之处就在于那一点默契。直白,便索然无味,而模糊,则让人不知所云。就是要在世人皆不懂的衬托下,才显得知己的难能。好比雾里看花,水中望月,对于互为知己的二人,却依然能看的明明白白。

可是,除却传说中的风雅人物不谈,什么样的条件才会让两个凡俗人成为知己?所谓同病相怜,即便是再截然不同的人,也能因为类似的经历而互相懂得。如果没有类似的经历而要互相懂得,那必然需要类似的心理机制,让一个人至少可以在想象中经历另一人之所经历。若是没有相似的经历,且连心理的机制都不同,那这两个人大概便是我们常说的“没有共同语言了”。

Read Full Post »

我曾經愛過你 普希金

爱情 ,也许在我的心里
还没有完全消亡,
但愿它不会再打扰你;
我也不想再使你难过悲伤。
我曾经默默无语地,
毫无指望地爱过你,
我既忍受着羞怯,
又忍受着嫉妒的折磨;
我曾经那样真诚,
那样温柔地爱过你,
但愿上帝保佑你,
另一个人也会像我爱你一样。

I loved you once: perhaps that love has yet
To die down thoroughly within my soul;
But let it not dismay you any longer;
I have no wish to cause you any sorrow.
I loved you wordlessly, without a hope,
By shyness tortured, or by jealousy.
I loved you with such tenderness and candor
And pray God grants you to be loved that way again.

Read Full Post »

Two eternities

Under Ben Bulben

WB Yeats

Many times man lives and dies
between his two eternities,
that of race and that of soul,
and ancient Ireland knew it all.
Whether man die in his bed
or the rifle knocks him dead,
a brief parting from those dear
is the worst man has to fear.
Though grave-diggers’ toil is long,
sharp their spades their muscles strong.
They but thrust their buried men
back in the human mind again.

Read Full Post »

Alone Again Or

Yeah, said it’s all right
I won’t forget
All the times I’ve waited patiently for you
And you’ll do just what you choose to do
And I will be alone again tonight my dear

Yeah, I heard a funny thing
Somebody said to me
You know that I could be in love with almost everyone
I think that people are
The greatest fun
And I will be alone again tonight my dear

by Love

以前很喜欢的一首歌。今天找出了它的歌词,忽然发现竟然和我这么像。

Read Full Post »